Personal Capacity Analysis (PCA)
Interpreting the Results
The test results can be used by the Freezone
practitioner to find traits and areas in life the client wants and needs to
improve. Any non-optimum trait can be addressed and improved through
processing.
The results are given as a score ranging from -100 to
+100 against each of 10 pairs of personality
traits.
A Stable / Unstable (dispersed)
B Happy / Depressed
C Composed / Nervous
D Reliable, personable / Unpredictable, erratic
E Active / Passive
F
Self-assured, aggressive / Submissive, inhibited
G Responsible / Irresponsible
H Reasonable, agreeable / Hyper critical, invalidates others
I Empathy,
high affinity / Insensitive to others, low affinity
J Communicative / Withdrawn
Obviously the higher the score, the better. However, it is also ideal that no one trait
is abnormally high or low compared to the others. The software that runs this test regards
a score of lower than -60, or a score of 40+ points below average (that is the average score
across all 10 traits for the given test), as being notably low. Similarly, a score over 60, or 40+ points higher than average, is noted as being high. Using these
notions of "high" and "low", the software also looks for "emergent traits" (combinations of
high and low values) as suggested by the original OCA manual.
Comparing one test to another
Obviously, the intent with processing is to improve a
person's lot in life. And processing should
give a rise in the results of this test. There are, however, some things which can lower a
result, even after the client is well into processing. One matter is covered in
the theory of the test, which suggests that a previous high score in the
test can come about as a result of the client coming out of an unwanted
artificial identity, role, or valence (the client was, say, a "keep smiling"
type of personality but felt lousy inside.) The
other matters, also covered in the theory, are:
Drop on trait H = havingness drop, surroundings seem less desirable, client
seems less grounded.
Whole graph or most of it drops = Upsets with
practitioner.
No change = Present time problems not touched by practitioner.
Drop on trait G = Practitioner evaluation (telling client what to think or
giving too many of own opinions.)
Drop on trait C = "Loss" of practitioner. Poor rapport between client and
practitioner. Poor practitioner control.
Drop on trait J = Disruptive "double" acknowledgements by practitioner,
putting client off before finished.
Drop on trait I = Lowered reality level.
Nervous (C) is the toughest point to raise on a graph. It is done by "finding the
practitioner".
This is a primary point to watch in low profiles. Did client find (connect with)
practitioner. Certain objective processes or drills (CCH 3 and
CCH 4) are the indicated processes for these low ones. They were designed to
"find the practitioner."
To
Home page
Instructions to
Testee: Read this before doing the test
Test
Questionaire: The actual test
Example of results: How to read the result of
the test
Interpreting the results
Tips on how to apply results to processing
The
Original OCA Manual For test evaluator's use
Legal disclaimer
|